WAF Detector.What’s guarding the front door?
Detect which WAF or security edge is protecting a site, how it behaves toward ordinary traffic, and what that choice implies for performance, from passive fingerprints only: no attack traffic, no exploit probes, nothing a production site would ever notice.
WAF Detector in four questions.
Cloud WAF, CDN-bundled WAF or appliance: identified from response signatures and challenge behavior.
How the edge treats ordinary requests: challenges, cookies, header rewrites, and what that costs in latency.
Every fingerprint that fired, so a security team can verify the identification independently.
Security layers are delivery layers; the report notes what the detected stack typically adds to response times.
How it works.
A transparent look at exactly what the tool checks, and how it reaches its answer.
WAF products leave consistent fingerprints in headers, cookies and block-page markup; we match them against a maintained library.
CoreHow the edge issues JavaScript or interstitial challenges to a plain browser-like request identifies families of products.
CoreOnly ordinary, harmless request variations are used, the tool never sends exploit payloads or malformed traffic.
PrincipleHeader, cookie and server fingerprints are matched against a maintained library covering the major WAF vendors.
SupportingWhat you’ll get.
The product or service in front, with confidence scoring.
IncludedChallenges, cookies and header rewrites seen during detection.
IncludedWhat the detected stack typically means for latency and caching.
IncludedEvidence included, ready for a security review thread.
IncludedWho it’s for.
Know what actually protects a property you’re acquiring, auditing or integrating with.
Confirm the WAF you pay for is the WAF that answers, misrouted zones are more common than anyone admits.
Mapping WAFs across an estate is step one of collapsing three security vendors into one.
See which security edges your market actually deploys, not which ones sponsor conferences.
Free to use. Live now in public beta.
The toolkit automates the detection and benchmark data behind the assessments we already run, the tools are how we prove the data is good.
Every tool ships free with shareable reports; the business model is the advisory behind it, not your email address.
Live now in public beta — free to run, refined as we expand coverage.
Want the answer before the tool exists? A free assessment runs the same analysis, human-graded, usually within 24 hours, and gives you a benchmark against pooled volume pricing.
WAF Detector in context.
The research this tool automates.
More free CDN World tools
All part of the same toolkit — passive, non-intrusive, no signup.
WAF Detector questions,
answered straight.
Is WAF Detector live?
It’s live now in public beta — free to run with no signup.
Is this a security scanner?
No, and deliberately so. It sends only ordinary, benign requests and identifies the protection layer from passive fingerprints. It never sends attack payloads, probes for vulnerabilities, or does anything a production site would register as hostile.
Which products can it identify?
The launch library targets the WAFs and WAF edges we meet most in assessments, the major CDN-bundled WAFs and standalone cloud products, and it will grow the way our CDN signature library did.
Can a WAF hide from it?
Some deployments mask well, and the report says so honestly: a low-confidence result with the evidence shown beats a confident guess.
Why does a CDN advisory build a WAF tool?
Because on modern stacks the WAF and CDN are one buying decision, you can’t advise on delivery without seeing the security layer in front of it.
I need this answered today.
A security-focused assessment covers WAF identification and posture, human-graded.
All product names, logos and brands referenced in tool reports are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. CDN World tools perform passive, non-intrusive analysis. Tool capabilities and launch timing described on this page are plans, not commitments, and may change.